About Me

Name: Dale
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Paying for Clinton

Today we are paying for the Clinton attempt at “social justice”, a Clinton effort to make things fair for everyone. How did it start, well in begun in the 1977 when Jimmy Carter sing into to law the Community Reinvestment Act. This law forced lenders to provide credit in mortgages, and small business loans to low income families. The social justice theory was that each bank had to consider the community needs of the entire community in their lending policies. Lenders were evaluated as to their community responsibility before they could expand their business. Community organizations were allowed to file complaints with government over banks lending policies. In 1995 the Clinton Administration revised the CRA regulations. They began to complain about “Red Lining”. “Red Lining” was described as the limit lenders put on loans, above the “red line” you received a loan or mortgage, below the line no money. The administration and members of congress cried unfair and forced lenders to make even more loans to people under the “red line.” Banks, in order not to get in trouble with the government regulators, and community group, had to make loans to people who did not qualify for mortgages. In order not to be caught with bad loads, banks bundled the loans with good loans and sold the other lenders. Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac were required, as semi-government organizations, to help lenders by buying these ill regular loans. As long as housing values increased these ill-regular loans were still “good paper”. When housing prices began to fall, these loans became bad investment. Though only about 2.7% of home mortgages default, nobody is sure which lenders have the bad loans. Therefore, all lenders stopped lending money and they couldn’t determine the value of the loans they held. Now the President is suggesting that to free up the credit market, the government buy these ill-regular loans. Taxpayers will pick up the Clinton effort at “Social Justice.” So when other candidates suggest that it’s only fair for government to… We need to remember the price we’ll pay today.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democratic talking points

The Democrats haven’t change their tune here is a quote form a 1935 radio speech by Democratic Senator Huey Long promoting a net asset income tax on the wealthy.
1. The fortunes of the multimillionaires and billionaires shall be reduced so that no one person shall own more than a few million dollars to the person. We would do this by a capital levy tax. On the first million that a man was worth we would not impose any tax. We would say, "All right for your first million dollars, but after you get that rich you will have to start helping the balance of us." So we would not levy any capital levy tax on the first million one owned. But on the second million a man owns we would tax that 1 percent, so that every year the man owned the second million dollars he would be taxed $10,000. On the third million we would impose a tax of 2 percent. On the fourth million we would impose a tax of 4 percent. On the fifth million we would impose a tax of 8 percent. On the sixth million we would impose a tax of 16 percent. On the seventh million we would impose a tax of 32 percent. On the eighth million we would impose a tax of 64 percent; and on all over the eighth million we would impose a tax of 100 percent. What this would mean is that the annual tax would bring the biggest fortune down to three or four million dollars to the person because no one could pay taxes very long in the higher brackets. But $3 to 4 million is enough for any one person and his children and his children's children. We cannot allow one to have more than that because it would not leave enough for the balance to have something.
2. We propose to limit the amount any one man can earn in 1 year or inherit to $1 million to the person.
3. Now, by limiting the size of the fortunes and incomes of the big men we will throw into the Government Treasury the money and property from which we will care for the millions of people who have nothing; and with this money we will provide a home and the comforts of home, with such common conveniences as radio and automobile, for every family in America, free of debt.
4. We guarantee food and clothing and employment for everyone who should work by shortening the hours of labor to thirty hours per week, maybe less, and to eleven months per year, maybe less. We would have the hours shortened just so much as would give work to everybody to produce enough for everybody; and if we were to get them down to where they were too short, then we would lengthen them again. As long as all the people working can produce enough of automobiles, radios, homes, schools, and theaters for everyone to have that kind of comfort and convenience, then let us all have work to do and have that much of heaven on earth.
5. We would provide education at the expense of the States and the United States for every child, not only through grammar school and high school but through to a college and vocational education. We would simply extend the Louisiana plan to apply to colleges and all people. Yes; we would have to build thousands of more colleges and employ a hundred thousand more teachers; but we have materials, men, and women who are ready and available for the work. Why have the right to a college education depend upon whether the father or mother is so well to do as to send a boy or girl to college? We would give every child the right to education and a living at birth.
 6. We would give a pension to all persons above 60 years of age in an amount sufficient to support them in comfortable circumstances, excepting those who earn $1,000 per year or who are worth $10,000. 7. Until we could straighten things out and we can straighten things out in two months under our program we would grant a moratorium on all debts which people owe that they cannot pay. And now you have our program, none too big, none too little, but every man a king.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dirty Politics

We think today's presidential elections dirty, but they are mild when compared to those of the past. As a matter of fact, the election of 1800 was so foul that the federalist newspapers claimed that the election of Thomas Jefferson would cause the "teaching of murder robbery, rape, adultery and incest", and the election lead to the death of Alexander Hamilton.

 During this period the winner of the election became president and the second place man was the Vice President. The election ended in a tie between Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, each getting 63 electoral votes, defeating the incumbent John Adams. The election went to the House of Representative to decide.
 
 It took 36 ballots and five days, before Federalist Alexander Hamilton arranged for Aaron Burr to lose by one vote. Hamilton and Burr became such bitter enemies, that Burr challenged and mortally wounded Hamilton in a duel on July 11, 1804. Vice President Aaron Burr was indicted for murder, and escaped to South Carolina.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Governors as Persident

 

I’ve been reviewing me American History, and by my count over the last one hundred years seven Presidents of the United States were Governors. That is more then any other group. They are; Woodward Wilson, NJ, Teddy Roosevelt, NY, Calvin Coolidge, MA, Franklin Roosevelt, NY, Jimmy Carter, GA, Ronald Reagan, CA. George W. Bush, TX. 

Only two presidents have come from the Senate, John Kennedy, and Warren Harding.   However, Harding served as Lieutenant Governor of Ohio before being elected to the Senate. Richard Nixon was a Senator before becoming Vice President. 

A governor is one of 50 chief executive officers in the country who get the experience considered necessary to run the over grown federal government.  It’s clear that the American people believe a state governor is the most qualified to be chief executive office of this country.   

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »